Current:Home > InvestPredictIQ Quantitative Think Tank Center:U.S. appeals court preserves partial access to abortion pill, but with tighter rules -InvestPioneer
PredictIQ Quantitative Think Tank Center:U.S. appeals court preserves partial access to abortion pill, but with tighter rules
PredictIQ View
Date:2025-04-06 21:35:05
A federal appeals court will allow partial access to the abortion drug mifepristone while a high-profile federal case plays out,PredictIQ Quantitative Think Tank Center but with new limitations on how the drug can be dispensed.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit says the drug, used in most medication abortions in the United States, remains approved for use up to seven weeks of pregnancy while the case is being appealed.
Previously, the drug was approved for up to 10 weeks. The ruling also says mifepristone can no longer be sent in the mail at least for now.
The Biden administration says it will appeal the Fifth Circuit's decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Late last week, U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk sided with anti-abortion rights groups that sued the Food and Drug Administration over its approval of the abortion pill mifepristone. He issued a ruling that would invalidate the drug's approval beginning this Friday unless the appeals court intervenes.
On Monday, the Department of Justice asked the Fifth Circuit for an emergency stay of Kacsmaryk's decision while the court hears the case. In their request, Justice Department lawyers argued that "the district court upended decades of reliance by blocking FDA's approval of mifepristone and depriving patients of access to this safe and effective treatment, based on the court's own misguided assessment of the drug's safety."
Mifepristone was approved by the FDA in 2000 and is now used in combination with another drug, misoprostol, in nearly all medication abortions in the United States. Mifepristone was initially approved for medication abortion through seven weeks of pregnancy, but in 2016, the FDA expanded that to 10 weeks.
The appeals court's decision means mifepristone will continue to be at least partially available while the case plays out.
It's unclear how the latest decision will interact with a ruling in a separate federal case in Washington state, filed by attorneys general from 17 states and the District of Columbia who are seeking to preserve access to the pills.
In that decision, also issued Friday shortly after Kacsmaryk released his ruling, U.S. District Judge Thomas O. Rice said the FDA was prohibited from "altering the status quo and rights as it relates to the availability of Mifepristone."
Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson, one of the leaders of that effort, told NPR he believes it will preserve access to mifepristone for people in those 17 states and D.C., unless a higher court says otherwise.
The Justice Department also filed a motion Monday asking Rice to clarify the meaning of his ruling, given there appears to be "tension" with Kacsmaryk's nationwide injunction.
On Thursday evening, Rice issued an order affirming that for the 17 states and D.C. — the parties in the case before him — access to mifepristone should remain unchanged, regardless of the Texas judge's injunction and the Fifth Circuit's decision. So these cases remain on a collision course.
A Supreme Court decision could clarify the path forward.
Meanwhile, several states led by Democratic governors have begun stockpiling abortion pills — either mifepristone or another drug, misoprostol. Misoprostol is usually used in combination with mifepristone but can be used alone to induce abortion.
Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey and Washington Gov. Jay Inslee have announced that their states have begun stockpiling mifepristone in the event that access is disrupted. California Gov. Gavin Newsom and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul say their states are stockpiling tens of thousands of doses of misoprostol.
veryGood! (538)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Meta's Threads wants to become a 'friendly' place by downgrading news and politics
- Once Cheap, Wind and Solar Prices Are Up 34%. What’s the Outlook?
- Twitter vs. Threads, and why influencers could be the ultimate winners
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- Every Bombshell From Secrets of Miss America
- A Timber Mill Below Mount Shasta Gave Rise to a Historic Black Community, and Likely Sparked the Wildfire That Destroyed It
- Hollywood actors go on strike, say it's time for studio execs to 'wake up'
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- Amazon Prime Day 2023 Tech Deals: Save on Apple Watches, Samsung's Frame TV, Bose Headphones & More
Ranking
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- Sweden's Northvolt wants to rival China's battery dominance to power electric cars
- Hotel workers' strike disrupts July 4th holiday in Southern California
- Activists Are Suing Texas Over Its Plan to Expand Interstate 35, Saying the Project Is Bad for Environmental Justice and the Climate
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- We spoil 'Barbie'
- Court pauses order limiting Biden administration contact with social media companies
- It's back-to-school shopping time, and everyone wants a bargain
Recommendation
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
The Explosive Growth Of The Fireworks Market
What to know about the drug price fight in those TV ads
Remember That Coal Surge Last Year? Yeah, It’s Over
US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
Two Indicators: After Affirmative Action & why America overpays for subways
Surprise, you just signed a contract! How hidden contracts took over the internet
Charli D'Amelio Shares 6 Deals You’ll Find in Her Amazon Cart for Prime Day 2023