Current:Home > MarketsLegal fight continues with appeals over proposed immigration initiative for Arizona Nov. 5 ballot -InvestPioneer
Legal fight continues with appeals over proposed immigration initiative for Arizona Nov. 5 ballot
View
Date:2025-04-18 09:08:48
PHOENIX (AP) — The fight to keep a proposed border initiative off Arizona’s Nov. 5 ballot is not over yet.
Immigrant advocates kept the issue alive this week by filing notice to the state Supreme Court that they will appeal the judge’s ruling.
A Maricopa County Superior Court judge on July 12 rejected an effort by the advocates to keep the proposed initiative off the ballot. The advocates argue that the measure breaks the rules because it deals with more than a single subject.
Attorney Andy Gaona, who represents some of the groups, was working Friday on legal briefs in the case that he filed later in the day. The Legislature will have until July 26 to respond, he said.
Gaona’s filing says that lumping unrelated provisions on one measure undermines the legislative process because it stifles debate, forcing a lawmaker to sign onto a provision they might not agree with because he or she supports another one grouped in the same proposal.
“We do think that single subject provision was violated,” Gaona said. “We hope that the court agrees.”
Supporters of the initiative argue that it deals with a single subject: the border.
The GOP-controlled Legislative in early June voted to allow to proposal to be placed on the ballot, asking voters if local law enforcement should be allowed to arrest migrants who cross illegally from Mexico into Arizona between ports of entry. The measure would also give state judges the power to order people convicted of the offense to return to their countries of origin.
It is similar to a Texas law that has been put on hold by a federal appeals court while it is being challenged.
Unlike the Texas law, Arizona’s proposal would also make it a felony punishable by 10 years of imprisonment for selling fentanyl that leads to a person’s death. Also included is a requirement that some government agencies use a federal database to verify a noncitizen’s eligibility for benefits.
The Republican-backed proposal bypasses Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs, who had vetoed a similar measure in early March and has denounced the effort to bring the issue to voters.
Supporters of the bill said it was necessary to ensure security along the state’s southern border, and that Arizona voters should be given the opportunity to decide the issue themselves. Opponents say the legislation would lead to racial profiling and create several millions of dollars in additional policing costs that Arizona cities, counties and the state can ill afford.
The measure would go before voters in a state expected to play a crucial role in determining which party controls the White House and the U.S. Senate — likely razor-close races in Arizona. Republicans hope it will focus attention on the border, which they accuse Biden of mishandling, and dilute the political benefits Democrats seek from an abortion-rights initiative.
Disorder on the border is a top motivator for many Republican voters who former President Donald Trump hopes will vote in big numbers.
President Joe Biden in early June unveiled plans to restrict the number of migrants seeking asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border.
This isn’t the first time Republican lawmakers in Arizona have tried to criminalize migration.
When passing a much-debated 2010 immigration bill, the Arizona Legislature considered expanding the state’s trespassing law to criminalize the presence of immigrants and impose criminal penalties. But the trespassing language was removed and replaced with a requirement that officers, while enforcing other laws, question people’s immigration status if they were believed to be in the country illegally.
The questioning requirement was ultimately upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court despite the racial profiling concerns of critics. But courts barred enforcement of other sections of the law.
veryGood! (6588)
Related
- Trump's 'stop
- Edmonton Oilers, general manager Ken Holland part ways
- Indictment accuses former Uvalde schools police chief of delays while shooter was “hunting” children
- Walgreens plans to close a significant amount of underperforming stores in the US
- Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
- The Supreme Court weakens federal regulators, overturning decades-old Chevron decision
- New Hampshire teacher says student she drove to abortion clinic was 18, denies law was broken
- Do you have 'eyebrow blindness'? The internet seems to think so.
- Small twin
- US Olympic track and field trials: Noah Lyles advances to semis in 200
Ranking
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- Georgia appeals court says woman who argues mental illness caused crash can use insanity defense
- Randall Cobb, family 'lucky to be alive' after Nashville home catches on fire
- The Fate of Perfect Match Revealed After Season 2
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- Tristan Thompson Calls Ex Khloé Kardashian His Best Friend in 40th Birthday Tribute
- Jury rules NFL must pay more than $4 billion to 'Sunday Ticket' subscribers
- Former Arkansas legislator Joyce Elliott experiences stroke, undergoes surgery, her family says
Recommendation
New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
GAP’s 4th of July Sale Includes an Extra 50% off Versatile Staples & Will Make You Say U-S-YAY
Complete Your Americana Look With Revolve’s 4th of July Deals on Beachy Dresses, Tops & More Summer Finds
Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich goes on trial in Russia on espionage charges
Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
The legal odyssey for OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma and its owners is complex. Here’s what to know
Vermont man who gave state trooper the middle finger and was arrested to receive part of $175,000 settlement
New Hampshire teacher says student she drove to abortion clinic was 18, denies law was broken