Current:Home > MarketsApple agrees to pay up to $500 million in settlement over slowed-down iPhones: What to know -InvestPioneer
Apple agrees to pay up to $500 million in settlement over slowed-down iPhones: What to know
View
Date:2025-04-11 17:26:53
Years after a lawsuit alleged Apple was adding software that slowed down older iPhones, the tech giant has agreed to pay a settlement worth hundreds of millions of dollars.
Cotchett, Pitre & McCarty, one of the firms representing Apple customers in the suit, announced Aug. 9 that the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals dismissed two appeals from people challenging the settlement. Apple has agreed to pay a minimum of $310 million and up to $500 million in compensation for approximately 100 million iPhone users, in what the firm is calling the "largest-all cash recovery in a computer intrusion case in history."
Between December 2017 and June 2018, there were 66 class action lawsuits filed against Apple alleging this issue, including that Apple deliberately slowed down battery performance of older iPhones with iOS updates, according to Bloomberg Law.
Why does my iPhone get hot?Here's how to beat the heat, keep you devices cool this summer
Who is eligible for Apple iPhone settlement?
In a 2017 letter to consumers, Apple apologized for slowing down older iPhones and offered a reduction in the price of replacement batteries. The company said in the letter that a software update from 2016 may have had some users "experience longer launch times for apps and other reductions in performance."
Payments will be distributed to people who filed claims before the October 2020 deadline and owned one of these phones:
- iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6S Plus and/or SE device that ran iOS 10.2.1 or later before Dec. 21, 2017
- iPhone 7 or 7Plus that ran iOS 11.2 or later before Dec. 21, 2017
For more details about the settlement, visit this website.
Around 3 million people filed and were approved, Verge reported, and expected payments are around $65.
Tech:A first-generation iPhone sold for $190K at an auction this week. Here's why.
veryGood! (9)
Related
- Sam Taylor
- Sports are a must-have for many girls who grow up to be leaders
- Jerry Jones lashes out at question about sun's glare at AT&T Stadium after Cowboys' loss
- Man charged with murder in fatal shooting of 2 workers at Chicago’s Navy Pier
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- NFL playoff picture Week 10: Lions stay out in front of loaded NFC field
- IAT Community Introduce
- US Open finalist Taylor Fritz talks League of Legends, why he hated tennis and how he copied Sampras
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Taylor Swift Politely Corrects Security’s Etiquette at Travis Kelce’s Chiefs Game
Ranking
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- 4 charged in Detroit street shooting that left 2 dead, 5 wounded
- Judith Jamison, a dancer both eloquent and elegant, led Ailey troupe to success over two decades
- Who's hosting 'SNL' tonight? Musical guest, start time, where to watch Nov. 9 episode
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- A crowd of strangers brought 613 cakes and then set out to eat them
- Timothée Chalamet Details How He Transformed Into Bob Dylan for Movie
- Oregon's Dan Lanning, Indiana's Curt Cignetti pocket big bonuses after Week 11 wins
Recommendation
New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
2025 NFL Draft order: Updated first round picks after Week 10 games
Anti-abortion advocates press Trump for more restrictions as abortion pill sales spike
US Open finalist Taylor Fritz talks League of Legends, why he hated tennis and how he copied Sampras
Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
Why the US celebrates Veterans Day and how the holiday has changed over time
Engines on 1.4 million Honda vehicles might fail, so US regulators open an investigation
Wisconsin’s high court to hear oral arguments on whether an 1849 abortion ban remains valid