Current:Home > FinanceAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -InvestPioneer
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-12 08:23:44
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (7)
Related
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- Video shows Florida authorities wrangling huge alligator at Air Force base
- Youngkin will visit Europe for his third international trade mission as Virginia governor
- Billionaire Texas oilman inks deal with Venezuela’s state-run oil giant as U.S. sanctions loom
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- The unfortunate truth about maxing out your 401(k)
- US banning TikTok? Your key questions answered
- Trump to receive 36 million additional shares of Truth Social parent company, worth $1.17 billion
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- Cristian Măcelaru to become music director of Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra in 2025-26
Ranking
- Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
- When can doctors provide emergency abortions in states with strict bans? Supreme Court to weigh in
- The unfortunate truth about maxing out your 401(k)
- Cowboys need instant impact from NFL draft picks after last year's rookie class flopped
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- Biden administration is announcing plans for up to 12 lease sales for offshore wind energy
- Tesla driver in Seattle-area crash that killed motorcyclist told police he was using Autopilot
- Tennessee lawmakers pass bill allowing teachers, school staff to carry concealed handguns
Recommendation
Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
FTC bans noncompete agreements that make it harder to switch jobs, start rival businesses
Family of man killed when Chicago police fired 96 times during traffic stop file wrongful death suit
Weapons chest and chain mail armor found in ancient shipwreck off Sweden
Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
Starbucks versus the union: Supreme Court poised to back company over 'Memphis 7' union workers
The Brilliant Reason Why Tiffany Haddish Loves Her Haters
More Than a Third of All Americans Live in Communities with ‘Hazardous’ Air, Lung Association Finds